NB! Oled kommentaaride lehel. Kommentaarid on avaldatud Delfi lugejate poolt. Kommentaare ei toimetata. Nende sisu ei pruugi ühtida Delfi toimetuse seisukohtadega.
Jagades riiklikes harukontorites makstud preemiakoguse vastava riigi elanike arvuga, saame tulemuseks, et Eesti edestas ühe riigikodaniku kohta pangatöötajaile makstud preemia summas mäekõrguselt kõiki teisi. Tähendab - Eesti potentsiaalne pangaklient on kõige parem! Meile tunnustus :-)
Eks ikka väiksemad tegelased peavad suurtemate möödapanekute eest maksma.
Kas siis need pangajuhid olid swedpanki üldistest tegevuspõhimõtetest nii sõltumatud?
I did comment last week in a Swedish news paper about bonus an excessive pay to directors in companies that been loosing value and money. I was talking about the situation in general and I remarked that i´ts in my opinion is necessary in this cases to try to talk to the directors and try to negotiate an agreement of paying back or decrease bonus if the result for the company is very negative. In cases like AIG it could be useful to withhold payments until it´s totally clear that the figures not has been manipulated in favour to decrease bonus payments. I said that, in specific cases, payments could be necessaryto frees payments and risking court actions. A part of my comment was misquoted. I was not proclaiming a need to take people to court in purpose to take payments back as a general rule. I´t has come to my knowledge that this article my be repeating the miss qoute. As my knowledge in Baltic an Eastern language unfortunately is very limited i´ts hard for me to know but I just wish to clearyfie that my comments was made i general and it should not be reed as a guideline how Swedbank is going to be handled by Folksam.
Swedbank võib Eesti pangajuhtidele makstud suurpreemiad tagasi nõuda
Tuvastamata Kasutaja
Tuvastamata Kasutaja
Tuvastamata Kasutaja
Tuvastamata Kasutaja
Kas siis need pangajuhid olid swedpanki üldistest tegevuspõhimõtetest nii sõltumatud?
Tuvastamata Kasutaja
Tuvastamata Kasutaja